User talk:Peter Dow
User page vandalism
[edit]If you list your user page and user talk page here then an automated bot will automatically revert anything it thinks is vandalism. --Hut 8.5 15:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have semi-protected this page for a while to prevent further harassment of this user by IPs. If you would like this undone, let me know. New users won't be able to post here until the semi-protection expires. Jehochman Talk 16:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Peter, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/GeorgeFormby1 has been investigated and closed, user:GeorgeFormby1 was using one of those IPs and is to be indefinitely blocked and his IP address blocked for a month. Hopefully this is the end of the matter. ϢereSpielChequers 06:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Forget about the vandals!
[edit]Just something to cheer you up after this vandal attacks!
Gavin (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
History cleaned
[edit]I have cleaned the history of your User and Talk page, per your concern at AN/I. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 15:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Stevie Vann
[edit]Since Talk:Stevie Vann was deleted, I've copied your comment there to User talk:Philosopher#Contacting you re: your deletion of "Stevie Vann" page. We can discuss it there. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- ...and it's
Done. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Re: My objection to you deleting "Talk: Stevie Vann" page
[edit]Re your message: I deleted the talk page per G8 because your post did not lead to the deletion of the article as the exemption is intended to cover. Instead, you were asking why it was deleted. The original article was deleted as a proposed deletion. The talk page was deleted as an orphaned talk page.
Since your goal appears to be to get the article restored/rewritten: if you want the original article restored, since it was a proposed deletion, you can ask for it to be restored by the deleting admin or through requests for undeletion. Or you can just recreate it. A proposed deletion does not prevent anybody from recreating the article or requesting its undeletion. All you have to do is ask. If you have a complaint about my administrative actions, you are welcome to bring them up at Administrator's Noticeboard. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Growth factor receptor inhibitor was accepted
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)August 2017
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist, from its old location at User:Peter Dow/Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 13:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist, from its old location at User:Peter Dow/Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 14:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)